piece or player?

a limited metaphor ... but applicable, nonetheless

Some riders, to me, race as rooks on a chess board ... one dimensional strikers, limited in direction but powerful in their single-minded approach. They push forward with a surge of strength that can knock down, bowl over, pummel. They are a fueled-up rocket, fused short, awaiting that match to launch, thrusting forth in whatever direction they find themselves pointed. No alteration once ignited, just pure speed ... and impact.

Other riders appear more bishop in facility ... hidden behind the action until an opening in the lines presents itself. The attack is diagonal - slicing into defenses, taking out competitors with a blindsided cunning that serves purposes either assassinative or pre-emptory. Working alone.

And then some might ride a more a knightly course ... skipping around in seemingly chaotic maneuver. These are the most active of riders, shooting off in random directions that often appear ineffective, but if used wisely - can bring about the most lethal damages. They are harrassers, evil shepherds, blockers, and occassionally the one to bring down that final blow upon a competitor.


When you race ... which piece are you? Are you pawnish in slow, but meaningful plods forward ... protecting and pushing forth with an inevitable wearing down of your opponents energies? Are you a queen that lashes out in any direction you choose, myriad of skill and speed ... the most feared but the most defended against, as well?

Or

are you the chess player behind it all ... seeing the board in its entirety instead of one piece's limited perspective. Do you see the difference between attacking when you can as opposed to attacking when it is best for your team?

Your strength as a rider may lend itself to a comparison to one of the chess pieces in play ... but it is the strength to see the landscape of the board, with all its flows and maneuvers, that makes a rider complete and formidable.



... whatever.